Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 Haw. 51 - State v. Mailo

State v. Mailo’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2017

22 state decisions

801987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Edwards v. Arizona · Smith v. Illinois · Solem v. Stumes · State v. Napeahi · State v. Ikaika

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Q Okay.... I am gonna ask you questions about a Sodomy, Kidnapping which occurred on 6-27-85 at 1164 Maunakea Street. Okay, understand? A Yeah. Q You don't have to talk now if you don't want to. You don't have to say anything to me or answer any of my questions. Anything you say may be used against you at your trial. You have the right to counsel of your choice or to talk to anyone else you may want to. You also have the right to have an attorney present while I talk to you. You know what an attorney is? Attorney is lawyer. You know what a lawyer is? A Oh, yeah. Q Okay? Same thing. If you cannot afford an attorney, the court will appoint one for you. Do you want an attorney now? A (Inaudible). Q You want a lawyer here while I talk to you? A Yeah. Q You want a lawyer now? ... while I talk to you or don't you want a lawyer? A Nah, `as all right. Q You don't want one? A Uh. Q Okay....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[O]nce an accused has expressed his desire to deal with police interrogators only through counsel, he cannot be further questioned until counsel has been made available to him, unless the accused initiates further communication, exchanges, or conversations with the police.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “he clearly understood `Yeah' as an affirmative response.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.