¶1delivered the opinion of the Court.
¶2The question in the court below was: Did appellees comply with their contract %
¶3The work was to be completed in a first-class manner.
¶4One of appellees testified that he did not say it was a first-class sidewalk; that it was a fair, ordinary walk, such as is being laid in Chicago by thousands.
¶5Another .witness for appellees testified that the walk, when finished, appeared to be a good, fair walk, as good as is usually built; in good condition every -way.
¶6The clear proponderance of the evidence is that the walk was never completed according to the contract. .
¶7The testimony as to the insufficiency of the walk is such that the opposing testimony ivas greatly overcome.
¶8The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed, and the cause remanded.