Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 MASSAPPCT 386 - Dube v. Lanphear

Dube v. Lanphear’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Coveney v. President & Trustees of the College of the Holy Cross · 105 Wash. 2d 457 - Dickinson v. Edwards · Manning v. Nobile · McGuiggan v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. · Cremins v. Clancy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[ajpplying existing social values and customs, it cannot reasonably be argued that the common practice of patronizing eating and drinking establishments with companions, each participant paying a fair share of the charges, imposes social host liability on each member of the group in the event one individual visibly drinks to excess and causes damage afterward.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.