Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 Md. App. 681 - Nash v. State

69 Md. App. 681 - Nash v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
July 2010
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently July 2010 · most notably Surratt v. Prince George's County (1990), 92 Md. App. 56 - Eiland v. State (1992)

26 state decisions

1001987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Time, Inc. v. Bon Air Hotel, Inc. · Arizona v. Manypenny · General Motors Corp. v. Lahocki · Harper v. Harper · Drug Fair of Maryland, Inc. v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is well settled that a judge’s previous participation in an earlier, related trial, is ‘beside the point’ where the judge is not acting as the fact finder in the present case, but rather simply presiding over its presentation to the jury. Indeed, even where the judge is to be the fact finder, there is no per se rule requiring recusal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.