Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 ME 494 - Cobb v. Dyer

Cobb v. Dyer’s Empirical Analysis

1879

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
16
states following
December 1948
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently December 1948 · most notably Emmert v. Thompson (1892), Geib v. Reynolds (1886)

3 federal appellate · 22 state decisions — followed in 16 states

6018791880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Muir v. Berkshire · Van Riper v. Van Riper

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a new mortgage is substituted in ignorance of an intervening lion, the mortgage released through mistake may bo restored in equity and given its original priority as a lien. This was done in a case where the holder of a first mortgage, in ignorance of the existence of a subsequent one on the premises, released his mortgage and took a new one. There was no evidence of mistake except such as might be inferred from the mortgagee’s- ignorance of the existence of the intermediate mortgage, and there was no evidence that he would not have made this arrangement had he known this fact; but it was considered that, although the court was not at liberty to infer facts not proved, yet that it was at liberty to draw all the inferences which logically and naturally follow from the -facts proved; that it is not an act of reasonable prudence and caution such as men commonly use in the conduct of business affairs for one having a first mortgage upon property, without consideration or other apparent motive, to release it, and take a new mortgage subject to a prior lien of a considerable amount; and therefore it may be inferred that the mortgagee would not have made the release had he known of the intervening mortgage. A court of equity will grant relief on the ground of mistake, not only when the mistake is expressly proved, but also when it is implied from the nature of the transaction. “Where a new mortgage is taken to secure the payment of the same debt, and the fact is so slated in t”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.