Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 MICH 396 - Holcomb v. Noble

Holcomb v. Noble’s Empirical Analysis

1888

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
9
states following
September 1990
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently September 1990 · most notably Schwartz v. Electronic Data Sytems, Inc. (1990), Jacobson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. (1916)

2 federal appellate · 29 state decisions

130188818901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Baughman v. Gould

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““I had as good a judge of pine as there is in Michigan examine this land, and a good judge of pine, and he estimates that there is about five million pine on the land, one-half of which is white pine, and the rest Norway; and he says that this is a very low estimate, and that the pine is of good quality. The white pine is scattering among hard wood, which usually indicates first-class pine. The land is worth, for farming purposes, $5 per acre after pine is off, and this is price of farming land in this locality. The land is close to logging stream, which carries logs to Alpena. There are quite a number of good farms in same township. I hold lands at $12.50 per acre, and think there is enough pine on land to pay for it at that price."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is admitted that in equity an actual design to mislead is not necessary if a party is actually misled by another in a bargain. There was abundant evidence in this' case to authorize the jury to find that defendant, whether honestly or dishonestly, expected plaintiff to act on his representations of the reliableness of the reports which he produced, and that plaintiff did rely on them. There is no reason for a difference in action in such cases between courts of law and courts of equity."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “as though it had proceeded from a vicious purpose....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.