Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 MICH 596 - Hale v. Risley

Hale v. Risley’s Empirical Analysis

1888

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
5
states following
July 1962
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 1962

8 state decisions

40188818901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stockdale v. School District No. Two · School District No. 8 v. Estes · School District No. 9 v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Mandamus is a discretionary writ, and will be allowed only in furtherance of justice upon a proper case presented. It will not be alloAved Avhere it is apparent that it is applied for to gratify the spite of a private individual nor where the relator has instigated, authorized or approved of the act complained of.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.