Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 Mich. App. 591 - Hackett v. Foodmaker, Inc.

69 Mich. App. 591 - Hackett v. Foodmaker, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2018

6 state decisions

4019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In both Lynas and Adolph there was evidence indicating that services under the contract for personal employment were commenced by plaintiff. Here plaintiff was never afforded an opportunity to perform under the contract due to defendant’s total repudiation thereof in that defendant never allowed plaintiff an opportunity to manage the Ypsilanti store. Unable to locate any Michigan case law on point we look to 4 Corbin on Contracts, § 958, p. 847, wherein we find the following: “A contract of employment to begin at a future time is totally broken by the employer’s refusal to begin such employment at that time. On such refusal, the employee has a single action for his injury, measured by the full amount of salary or wages promised, less what he can earn by reasonable effort in other similar employment.” Hence, we hold that, if a contract was proven by plaintiff that he was to become manager of the Ypsilanti store and was prevented from so doing due to defendant’s repudiation thereof prior to the time any services were commenced, plaintiff has a right to recover.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.