Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

69 Minn. 505

Looney v. Drometer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 2, 1897

Supreme Court of Minnesota · decided 1897-11-02

Action for trespass brought in justice’s court. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant attempted to appeal to the district court for Dakota county on questions of law alone. The court, Crosby, J., denied plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal, and from a judgment of the district court reversing the justice’s judgment, plaintiff appealed.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1901

1 state decisions

Relies on Goodnow v. Board of Commissioners · Spencer v. Tozer · Tyler v. Hanscom

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Reversed · Decided 1897-11-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The district court should have granted plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it did not appear that the notice of appeal, with proof of service, was ever filed with the justice as required by statute. This is a jurisdictional prerequisite to the al*506lowance of an appeal that cannot be dispensed with. Without it there is no appeal. Marsile v. Milwaukee, 28 Minn. 4; Larrabee v. Morrison, 15 Minn. 151 (196). There is no presumption that the notice of appeal was filed. Every jurisdictional fact must appear in the return of the justice. McFarland v. Butler, 11 Minn. 42 (72); Marsile v. Milwaukee, supra. If the notice of appeal was in fact filed with the justice, but the justice’s return was defective, the appellant might, on a proper showing, have applied to the district court for an order directing the justice to make an amended return; but, as this was not done, the court should have granted plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal.

¶2Judgment reversed, and cause remanded, with directions to the district court to dismiss the appeal.

/69/minn/505 · .json · Public domain