Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

69 Miss. 403

Murphy v. Jackson

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1891

Mississippi Supreme Court · decided 1891-10-15

From the chancery court of Harrison county. Hon. Sylvanus Evans, Chancellor. The appellant, Murphy, filed the bill in this case to foreclose a mortgage executed by Frank Jackson. The mortgagor, Jackson, was made a defendant to the bill, and so was B,. Seal, who, it was alleged, had some claim to the mortgaged laud, acquired from Jackson after the execution of the mortgage.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1959

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1891-10-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Woods, J.,

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2The. admirable candor of the able counsel for appellees renders any argument by the court unnecessary. The luminous statement of counsel completely covers and disposes of the case, and we make it our own.

¶3It is matter of regret to us that, in reversing the decree of the court below, we cannot remand, with leave to appellee, Seal, to amend his answer in the manner “shadowed forth in Jackson’s testimony.” We would be glad to discharge the grateful obligation counsel has imposed upon us by meeting their wishes in this particular, but, under the settled law of this state, we cannot. If the amendment desired were permitted to be made, the defense would still prove ineffectual. The case of Markham v. O’Connor, 52 Ga., 183, is authority for the position stated by counsel; but the rule is otherwise in this state. See Staton v. Bryant, 55 Miss., 261; Sulphine v. Dunbar, Ib., 255.

¶4Let the decree of the court beloio be reversed and a decree entered here for the appellant.

/69/miss/403 · .json · Public domain