Public-domain · open source

69 N.C. 271

Davis v. . Parker .

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1873

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1873-06-05

Controversy, which might be the subject of a civil action, submitted without action to Clarke, J., at Wayne Superior Court, 11th day of February, 1873, upon the following case agreed: In the year 1869, one Sarah Davis, of Wayne county, died, leaving a last will and testament, as follows: “STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, Wayne County. “ I, Sarah Davis, of said county, do, this 11th day of December, 1868, make-and declare this to be my .last will and ..testament, in manner and form…

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1919

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1873-06-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1This case is governed by Hilliard v. Kearney, Busb. Eq. 221, where the rule is thus stated: "When the estate is defeasible, and no time is fixed on at which it is to *276 become absolute, and the property itself is given and not the mere use of it, if there by any period intermediate between the death of the testator and the death of the legatee, at which the estate may fairly be considered absolute, that time will be adopted."

¶2"If there be no intermediate period, and the alternative is either to adopt the time of the testator's death, or the death of the legatee generally. … As the period at which the estate is to become absolute, the former will be adopted unless there be words to forbid it, or some consideration to turn the scale in favor of the latter."

¶3Here the testatrix after providing for the payment of her debts and funeral expenses, says, "the balance of my property of all kind I give to my grandson, Thomas Hollowell, to him and his heirs, and if he should die and leave no lawful heirs of his body, then and in that case I give Celia Mayo the sum of $200, to her and her heirs, and all the balance of my property I give to my nearest relations, c."

¶4The estate of John Thomas was an absolute one at the death of the testatrix, and went upon his death to his representatives.

¶5A judgment may be drawn in conformity with this opinion. Judgment below reversed.

¶6Judgment reversed, and decree accordingly. *277

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Case posture

Posture: CONTROVERSY, which might be the subject of a civil action, submitted without action to Clarke, J. , at WAYNE Superior Court, 11th day of February, 1873, upon the following CASE AGREED: In the year 1869, one Sarah Davis, of Wayne county, died, leaving a last will and testament, as follows: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, WAYNE COUNTY. I, Sarah Davis, of said county, do, this 11th day of December, 1868, make and declare this to be my last will and testament, in manner and form following, viz.: It is my will and desire after my decease for my burial expenses to be paid and all my just debts. The balance of my property of all kind, I give to my grandson, John Thomas Hollowell, to him and to his heirs; and if he should die and leave no lawful heirs of his body, then in that case, I give Celia Mayo the sum of two thousand dollars, to her and to her heirs, and all the balance of my property I give to my nearest relations, all except Joshua Davis and the children of his brother, John Davis, deceased. To Joshua Davis I give ten cents, and to each one of Joshua Davis' children ten cents — and the balance of my property to be equally divided among the balance of my nearest relatives. Lastly, I nominate my grandson, John Thomas Hollowell, my executor to this my last will and testament, to all intents and purposes. Given under my hand and seal, the day and date above mentioned. Signed, c. This will was duly probated before the Judge of Probate of Wayne county, and recorded, and Jessee Hollowell was appointed and qualified as administrator, durante minore aetate cum testamento annexo , the said John Thomas Hollowell, being at the execution of said will an infant of 19 years of age. At the date of said will the nearest relations of said testatrix were Matthew Davis, Joshua Davis, referred to in said will and Joshua Parker, who were her nephews. Said Matthew Davis died after said testatrix and before John Thomas Hollowell, leaving Mary E. Davis, the plaintiff, his heir at law and distributee. Indiana Parker, another plaintiff, is a grand neice [niece] of said Sarah Davis, whose father, a nephew of said Sarah, had died in the lifetime of said Sarah, and before said will was executed. There was devised by said will and included in the residuary clause thereof, a tract of land in said county. Personal property, which has been converted into money by said administrator was bequeathed in said will and said residuary clause, to the amount of $500. John Thomas Hollowell died intestate in said county in the year 1871, without issue, and the said Jesse Hollowell was only qualified as the administrator of the estate. Jesse is the heir at law and distributee of John Thomas. The debts due from the estate of the said Sarah Davis and the said John Thomas Hollowell are paid. The plaintiffs demand judgment against the defendants that they be declared entitled to share in the lands and money devised and bequeathed by said will and said residuary clause equally with said defendant, Joshua Parker. Said defendant, Joshua, denies the right of said plaintiffs, or either of them, to share in said property, claiming the whole as the nearest relative of said Sarah Davis. And the said Jesse Hollowell denies the right of either said plaintiffs or said defendant, Joshua, to share in said property, claiming the whole as the heir at law and distributee of said John Thomas, and demands judgment for his costs. And the parties submit all their rights upon the above state of facts to the judgment of the said Court. His Honor, upon full consideration of the case, adjudged: 1. That the plaintiff, Indiana Parker, and the defendant, Jesse Hollowell, are entitled to no part of the property devised and bequeathed by Sarah Davis' will. 2. That the plaintiff, Mary E. Davis, and the defendant, Joshua Parker, are entitled to the whole of said property in equal proportions; and that said Mary E., recover of said Jesse the sum of $250, being the whole amount of money in said Jesse's hands as administrator under said Sarah Davis' will; and that they recover possession of the tract or. parcel of land mentioned in the case agreed, as tenants in common. And it is further adjudged that the costs be paid out of said fund. From which said judgment the defendants and the plaintiff, Indiana Parker, appealed.

Source: CourtListener

Court

Supreme Court of North Carolina