Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

69 N.C. 53

Rowland v. . Gardner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1873

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1873-06-05

This was a civil action to recover possession of a tract, of land, tried before his Honor, Henry, J., at the Spring Term, 1873, of the Superior Court of Yancey county. After answer filed at the trial term, but before the trial,, the defendant’s counsel moved the Court for a rule upon the-plaintiff to produce the authority under which the suit is brought in the name of the heirs of Thomas Wilson, deceased. This motion was overruled, and the defendant’s counsel excepted.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1873-06-05

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 1941

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

2018731880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Settle, J.

¶1 None of the defendant’s exceptions are well taken.

¶2 The demand, when the case was called for trial, that the plaintiff’s counsel should show his authority for using the names of the heirs of Thomas Wilson as plaintiffs, came too late. Rice v. Rice, 66 N. C. Rep. 377.

¶3*55 The objection that there is a misjoinder of parties is of no ■consequence.

¶4 Under our new practice the failure to join a proper party is an important matter, but the joinder of unnecessary parties, either as plaintiffs or defendants, is immaterial, save ■only as it may affect the question of costs.

¶5 The plaintiff, Rowland, after showing a grant from the •State in 1798 covering the lands in controversy, and mesne conveyances making a perfect title down to Thos. Wilson, who has been absent from the State from forty to forty-six years, and the general report of his death among his relatives in this State, produced a deed from George Wilson to himself bearing date in 1840, and showed a continuous possession of the part in controversy, open and adverse to all others, from 1840 to the date of the defendant’s entry in 1868.

¶6 There was color of title, and adverse possession for twenty-eight years, when only seven years were required to ripen into a perfect title.

¶7 No error.

¶8 Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

/69/nc/53 · .json · Public domain