69 N.C. App. 447 - Huff v. Huff’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Stambaugh v. Stambaugh · Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. American Pharmaceutical Ass'n · Childress v. Johnson Motor Lines, Inc. · Smith v. Smith · 343 Ill. App. 539 - Kleinschmidt v. Kleinschmidt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he [trial court] has power not only to set the amount of security but to dispense with any security requirement whatsoever where the restraint will do the defendant “no material damage,” [citations omitted] where there “has been no proof of likelihood of harm,” [citations omitted] and where the applicant for equitable relief has “considerable assets and [is] . . . able to respond in damages if [defendant] does suffer damages by reason of [a wrongful] injunction” [citations omitted].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.