Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 N.H. 1 - State v. Griffin

State v. Griffin’s Empirical Analysis

1896

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
10
states following
September 1999
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently September 1999 · most notably Watson v. Division of Motor Vehicles (1931), Rosenblum v. Griffin (1938)

2 federal appellate · 49 state decisions — followed in 10 states

10018961900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mugler v. State of Kansas State of Kansas Tufts · Opinion of the Justices · Merrill v. Sherburne · State v. K. · Pierce v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Rights of property,... are subject to such reasonable limitations in their enjoyment as shall prevent them from being injurious, and to such reasonable restraints and regulations established by law as the legislature... may think necessary and expedient.” “This is very different from the right of eminent domain, the right of a government to take and appropriate private property to public use whenever the public exigency requires it, which can be done only on condition of providing a reasonable compensation therefor. The power we allude to is rather the police power ....” “ .... It is not an appropriation of the property to a public use, but the restraint of an injurious private use by the owner, and is therefore not within the principle of property taken under the right of eminent domain.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.