Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 N.J. 420 - State v. Carter

State v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
3
states following
September 2023
most recently cited

5 district · 32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently September 2023 · most notably State v. Carter (1982), Carter v. Rafferty (1987)

5 district · 32 state decisions

140197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Giglio v. United States · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · Relford v. Commandant, U. S. Disciplinary Barracks · Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “evidence that affirmatively tends to establish a defendant's innocence”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he test for the judge in evaluating a recantation upon a motion for a new trial is whether it casts serious doubt upon the truth of the testimony given at the trial and whether, if believable, the factual recital of the recantation so seriously impugns the entire trial evidence as to give rise to the conclusion that there resulted a possible miscarriage of justice. His first duty is, therefore, to determine whether the recanting statement is believable. [Ibid, (citing State v. Puchalski, 45 N.J. 97, 107-08 , 211 A.2d 370 (1965)).]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.