Gunsch v. Gunsch’s Empirical Analysis
1954
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2023
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hodous v. Hodous · Gunsch v. Gunsch · Hasselbring v. Koepke · Beard v. Arbuckle · In re Pennell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In Ingwalson v. Aney, 54 N.D. 627 , 210 N.W. 498, 500 , it is said: “ ‘Whether in any given case a situation exists which justifies or requires the appointment of a receiver is one addressed to the sound legal discretion of the district court and its order will not be disturbed on appeal unless clearly wrong. 2 Tardy’s Smith on Receivers, 2d ed. p. 1954’. See also Dale v. Duffy, 44 N.D. 33 , 176 N.W. 97 , 45 Am.Jur. Receivers, Sec. 47, p. 43.” Gunsch v. Gunsch, supra, 69 N.W.2d at 748 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Olson v. Brodell“is to maintain the cause in status quo until a trial on the merits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Holecek
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.