Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 NY 148 - Durant v. . Abendroth

Durant v. . Abendroth’s Empirical Analysis

1877

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
May 1950
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1950 · most notably Giles v. Vette (1924), President & Directors of the Manhattan Co v. Laimbeer (1888)

32 state decisions

140187718801890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ The statute ■ peremptorily requires an affidavit that the capital has been actually paid in cash, and withholds its protection from the special partner if the affidavit be not true. The object of this provision is to secure certainty, and to prevent equivocal transactions in the formation of these partnerships. Nothing but cash satisfies its requirement. No engagement or security, however good, can be substituted even temporarily, and the affidavit of the actual payment must be filed with the certificate. However honest the intention of the parties may be, if this affidavit is not absolutely true, the consequences prescribed by the statute must follow, and they cannot be averted by a subsequent payment, nor by the consideration that no injury resulted to any creditor from the affidavit not being true when made. “ The payment in this case was made by a check of the special partner dated, and therefore payable, on the 31st of December, 1870. This clearly was not cash on the 23d, when it was delivered to the general partners and the affidavit was made. It was, in fact, paid on presentation on the 2d of January, 1871.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.