69 N.Y. Sup. Ct.
Volume 69 — New York Supreme Court Reports
106 opinions
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 36Appeal Goddard (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 114People v. White (1891)
Appeal by the defendant Luther S. White from a judgment of the Court of Sessions of Schoharie county, rendered against him therein on the 14th day of December, 1889, whereby he was convicted of the crime of forgery in the second degree and was sentenced to imprisonment in a State’s prison for the term of five years at hard labor; and also from an order, entered in the office of the clerk of said county on said 14th day of December, 1889, denying his motion for a new trial.
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 263Claim of Phœnix Iron Co. v. The Vessels "Hopatcong" (1891)
<p>Appeals by the Hoboken Land and Improvement Company, the owner of the vessels “ Hopatcong ” and “ Musconetcong,” from two orders, each entered in the office of the clerk of Orange county on the 7th day of August, 1891, granting an extra allowance to the Chester Rolling Mills and to the Phoenix Iron Company, respectively.</p> <p>The proceedings in each ease were taken under the Laws of 1862 (chap. 482) against the vessels u Hopatcong ” and “ Musconetcong,” and the question of costs arose under section 24 thereof. The proceedings were begun in 1885 by both claimants and went on together. The first trial was had at Special Term, and the decrees there entered were dated July 31, 1885. Both claimants appealed to the General Term from certain portions of the decrees, and were successful in their appeal. A new trial was liad at Special Term, and the decrees entered thereon were dated November 7, 1888. Prom these decrees both claimants appealed to the General Term, which reversed the decrees, with costs to abide the event. Thereupon the Hoboken Land and Improvement Company appealed to the Court of Appeals, giving the usual stipulation. The Court of Appeals affirmed the order of the General Term in each case and rendered judgment absolute against the Lloboken Land and Improvement Company, with costs. Thereupon each claimant moved at Special Term for an extra allowance. The appellant objected to this in each case on the ground that the proceedings were special proceedings and, further, that there was no power in the court to make any allowance. The allowance to the Chester Rolling Mills was of five per cent on $12,426.63, and to the Phcenix Iron Company of five per cent on $6,325.27.</p>
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 275In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Clark (1891)
Appeal by Simon F. Mann, as executor of tbe will of Nancy A. Y. Hartshorn, deceased, and late temporary administrator of her estate, from so much of a decree entered in the office of the surrogate of Rensselaer county on the 20th day of July, 1891, as directs and adjudges: First.
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Vandevort (1892)
Appeal by Peter Garloclc, as one of the executors of Thomas Yandevort, deceased, from that portion of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, entered in the office of the surrogate of Ontario county on the 2d day of November, 1890, whereby it was adjudged and decreed that the objections to said account be, and the same were, dismissed, and that the third clause of the first codicil to said testator’s will was inoperative and void; and also from that other portion of said decree…
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618Barker v. Town of OsweGatchie (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618Clark v. Todd (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618In re the Dissolution of the Whitehall Lithographic Co. (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618Johnson v. Village of Glens Falls (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618Smith v. Pelott (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618Astheimer v. O'Pray (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618Bagley & Sewall Co. v. Saranac River Pulp & Paper Co. (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618Birge v. Berlin Iron Bridge Co. (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618Church v. Barkman (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618Cooper v. Harvey (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618Gallup v. Belmont (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618Hailey v. Ano (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618Holmes v. Union Telegraph & Telephone Co. (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618Humphrey v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618In re Taggard (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618Jackson v. Collins (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618Keefer v. Greene (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618Moore v. Brown (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618Mussen v. White (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618Noonan v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618People ex rel. Glens Falls Insurance v. Landon (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618People v. Wilson (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618Pitts v. Lighthall (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618Price v. Holman (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618Strack v. Hurd (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618Thompson v. Fuller (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 618Wilsie v. Rooney (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 619Zimmer v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Anderson v. Supreme Council (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Dent v. Society of the Friars Minor (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Excelsior Brick Co. v. Village of Haverstraw (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Gedney v. Kingsley (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Hoskins v. Stewart (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620McNally v. Phœnix Insurance (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620People ex rel. Trustees of St Patrick's Cathedral v. Davren (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Reynolds v. Craus (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Slater v. McGuire (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Daly v. Hellman (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Paddock v. Spiedel (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Coyne v. Manhattan Railway Co. (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Martin v. Matthews (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Schild v. Central Park, North & East River Railroad (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Cargain v. Everett (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Cunger v. Kinney (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Thomas v. Henjes (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Young v. Kingsbury (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Bridge v. Orange County Railroad (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Brusie v. Peck Bros. (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Campbell v. Ernest (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Emmerson v. Emmerson (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Giraldo v. Coney Island & Brooklyn Railroad (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Haynes v. Hatch (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Kellow v. Long Island Railroad (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Kipp v. Scott (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Krey v. Schlussner (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Leach v. Brooklyn, Bushwick & Queens County Railroad (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Molloy v. Board of Health (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620People ex rel. Curtin v. Board of Education (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Simons v. Evans (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Stegman v. Hollingsworth (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Thurber-Whyland Co. v. Klittner (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Valk v. McKiege (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620White v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 620Wilcox v. Quinby (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 621Carpenter v. Carpenter (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 621Fitzpatrick v. New York Elevated Railroad (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622In re Fields v. Dessar (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Magnolia Anti-Friction Metal Co. v. Singley (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Nooney v. New York Elevated Railroad (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622People v. American Loan & Trust Co. (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622People v. Fisher (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Simmons v. Craig (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622In re the Probate of a Paper Propounded as the Last Will & Testament of Peck (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Van Rensselaer v. Bull (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Abbott v. Petersburg Granite Quarrying Co. (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Brennan v. Hall (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Brooks v. Dick (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Carpenter v. Shook (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Cavanagh v. New York Elevated Railway Co. (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Cowen v. Paddock (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Cutter v. Hume (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Eickwort v. Powers (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Ellis v. Lyceum (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Evers v. Weil (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Haar v. Consolidated Carson River Dredging Co. (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Foote (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Lawson v. Douglass (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Lewis v. Wilson (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Lowenstein v. Salinger (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622McLean v. Horn (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Mellwitz v. Manhattan Railway Co. (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622People v. Barker (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622People v. Lewis (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622People v. McGonegal (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Rice v. Thompson (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Rycroft v. Green (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Sanders v. Soutter (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Vingut v. Vingut (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622Washington Glass Co. v. Benjamin (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 622White v. Davis (1891)
- 69 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 623Taylor v. Taylor (1891)