69 Ohio App. 344 - Meyer v. Parr’s Empirical Analysis
1941
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2006
3 federal appellate · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Andrews v. . Gardiner · Rogers Nat. Bank v. Marion County · McKee v. Hughes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This is an administrative board [State Board of Embalmers] — a part of the executive department — engaged in executing or enforcing the law. The hearing which it gives is for the sole purpose of ascertaining information in the light of which it can intelligently and judiciously enforce the rule of the statute. This is not an exercise of judicial power. It is an exercise of that circumspection and sound discretion that should characterize the conduct of every official whether judicial, executive, or legislative.” 69 Ohio App. at 349 , 37 N.E.2d at 640 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he judicial department is not the policy making branch of the government, and is not at liberty to usurp the function of that department”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.