69 Ohio App. 2d 30 - Mancino v. Friedman’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2005
3 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc. · 39 Ohio App. 2d 97 - Adomeit v. Baltimore · 53 Ohio St. 2d 9 - Doddridge v. Fitzpatrick · Ostrander v. Parker-Fallis Insulation Co. · 56 Ohio App. 2d 223 - Bates & Springer, Inc. v. Stallworth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘‘Duress involves illegality, and implies that a person has been unlawfully constrained by another to perform an act under circumstances which prevent the exercise of free will, and it can never constitute fraud or duress to do as and what a person has the legal right to do,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.