69 Ohio App. 3d 509 - State v. Riley’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “R.C. 2925.51(E) provides that any individual accused of a violation of R.C. Chapter 2925 is entitled, upon proper written request, to have a portion of the substance forming the basis of the alleged violation preserved for the benefit of independent analysis performed by a laboratory analyst employed [by] the accused.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Napier

2. “[o]ur prior decisions in Godby and Smallwood are dispositive of the case at bar and we find that the trial court did not err in dismissing the indictment against appellee”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Napier

3. “[t]he Smallwood decision * * * affirmed the dismissal of the indictment as a proper remedy for a violation of R.C. 2925.51(E).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Napier