Carpenter v. Jamerson’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2013
3 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Michigan v. Doran · In re Complaint in Habeas Corpus of Rowe · Hughes v. Pflanz · 82 Ohio App. 414 - In Re Roma · 87 Ohio App. 520 - State, Ex Rel. Toht v. McClure, Dir.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A person charged in any state with treason, felony, or other crime, who shall flee from justice, and be found in another state, shall on demand of the executive authority of the state from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the state having jurisdiction of the crime.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Interstate extradition was intended to be a summary and mandatory executive proceeding derived from the language of Art. IV, §2, cl. 2, of the Constitution. *** The Clause never contemplated that the asylum state was to conduct the kind of preliminary inquiry traditionally intervening between the initial arrest and trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“who has not satisfied the judgment against him is a fugitive from justice where he is unable to rebut by proof beyond a reasonable doubt the presumption of fugitivity attached to the governor's warrant. 34 In the habeas proceeding sub judice, the extradition request asserts that the petitioner is”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.