Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 OHIOST3D 102 - State v. Lynds

State v. Lynds’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 1994
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Carroll v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · South Dakota v. Opperman · Smith v. Ohio · State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the course of this further search the officer took Lynds's keys and opened the trunk of his automobile and discovered items that later proved to be stolen goods. When asked under oath why she opened the trunk, Officer Lemley replied:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Yet just minutes later, on cross-examination, Officer Lemley testified that the reason she confined Lynds in her police cruiser prior to searching the car was”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.