Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

69 Ohio St. 3d 403

In re Salisbury

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1994

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1994-06-08

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1999

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1994-06-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1We concur in the board’s finding and its recommendation. Accordingly, we order that Elizabeth A. Salisbury be suspended for an indefinite period from the practice of law in Ohio. This suspension is to terminate upon a showing of her compliance with the condition set by the board, followed by further review by the board of her character, fitness, and moral qualifications for admission to the practice of law.

¶2Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur.
Pfeifer, J.,

¶3dissents and would instead refer this matter to Disciplinary Counsel.

/69/ohiost3d/403 · .json · Public domain