King v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis
1918
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 1934
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hathaway v. Hoffman · Chupco v. Chapman · Johnson v. Johnson · Hatfield v. Lotty
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The act of Congress approved May 27, 1908 ( 35 Stat. 312 , c. 199), entitled ‘An act for the removal of restrictions from part of the lands of allottees of the Five Civilized Tribes, and for other purposes,’ is a revising act, and was intended as a substitute for all former acts’ relating to the subject of such restrictions, and operated to repeal the provisions of an act of Congress approved April 26, 1906 ( 34 Stat. 137 , c. 1876), and previous congressional enactments in conflict therewith on the same subject.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McCoy v. Mayo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.