Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 Okla. 64 - In Re Inglis

In Re Inglis’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
June 1991
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 1991

8 state decisions

40191719201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bell's Gap Railroad v. Pennsylvania · Bell's Gap Co v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania · Merchants' Manufacturers' Nat Bank of Pittsburg v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania · Feibelman v. Packard · Paddell v. City of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““All property is to be valued to the assessor, by the person whose duty it is to list the same, but the assessor may place a different value on the same if he is satisfied that the value so given is not correct, and he shall give to the person so listing the same, a copy of the schedule; and the assessor shall seek to have assessed the same classes of .property at a uniform value throughout the county.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.