Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 Okla. Crim. 369 - Spann v. State

69 Okla. Crim. 369 - Spann v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
October 1962
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently October 1962 · most notably 84 Okla. Crim. 97 - Sadler v. State (1947), Harris v. State (1962)

1 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

160194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Moore v. State of Missouri · 63 Okla. Crim. 84 - Chesser v. State · 69 Okla. Crim. 363 - Pitzer v. State · 7 Okla. Crim. 544 - Ex Parte Jefferies · 14 Okla. Crim. 54 - Tucker v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Habitual criminal statute, Penal Code, Art. 6, Sections 1817 and 1818, O. S. 1931, 21 Okla. St. Ann. §§ 51 and 52, does not create or define a new or independent crime, but describes circumstances wherein one found guilty of a specific crime may be more severely penalized because of his previous conviction, as alleged and found. ‘Habitual criminality’ is a state and not a crime.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““If there is a. conflict in the evidence or different inferences may be drawn therefrom, it is the province of the jury to weigh the evidence and determine the facts; and their determination should not be interfered with unless it appears that such determination was not sustained by sufficient evidence or was influenced in some way by passion or prejudice.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.