69 Okla. Crim. 71 - Key v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1940
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 34 Okla. Crim. 52 - Phillips v. State · 37 Okla. Crim. 32 - Chance v. State · 39 Okla. Crim. 1 - Gilstrap v. State · 56 Okla. Crim. 105 - Harris v. State · 45 Okla. Crim. 281 - Davis v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To allow a defendant, who has able ,and competent counsel already employed to represent him, to procure a continuance of a case merely by employing a member, of the Legislature would give every defendant charged with crime the right to continue his case during a session of the Legislature. No doubt this would be contrary ■ to the spirit and letter of this act.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gardner v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.