¶1The opinion of the court below in discharging a rule to show cause why the. judgment should not be opened and the defendant let into a defense, is a complete answer to the assignment of error which is urged upon our attention, and for the reasons therein given the decree is affirmed.
69 Pa. Super. 243
Conklin v. Chaffee
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 2, 1918
Superior Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1918-03-02
Appeal, No. 282, Oct. T., 1917, by defendant, from order of C. P. Bradford Co., May T., 1916, No. 5, discharging rule to open judgment in case of Gustayus Conklin y. Maggie Chaffee. Rule to open judgment. Maxwell, P. J., filed the following opinion: .
Affirmed · Decided 1918-03-02