Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

69 S.W.3d 126

State v. Kline

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 2002

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2002-02-26

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2019

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-02-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2Mark Kline appeals his conviction of one count of delivery of a controlled substance, § 195.211, RSMo. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶3The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

/69/sw3d/126 · .json · Public domain