Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

69 S.W.3d 503

Taylor v. Taylor

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 2002

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2002-03-05

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2017

1 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-03-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Order

PER CURIAM.

¶2Deanna Taylor appeals the rulings of the trial court on a motion for contempt and a motion to execute on an appeal bond. Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we conclude the judgment should be affirmed. A published opinion would lack precedential value. A memorandum as to the reasons for our decision has been furnished to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

/69/sw3d/503 · .json · Public domain