Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

69 S.W.3d 89

State v. Whitney

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 2001

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2001-11-27

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 2016

15 state decisions

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-11-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Order

PER CURIAM.

¶2Hubert E. "Whitney, Jr., appeals from the judgment under which he was sentenced, after being found guilty by a jury of possession of a controlled substance, as a prior and persistent offender to seven years in the Missouri Department of Corrections. During voir dire, Mr. "Whitney made Batson objections to the State’s use of its peremptory strikes to remove three venirepersons from the panel. Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986). He alleges on appeal that the trial court clearly erred in overruling those objections.

¶3We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

/69/sw3d/89 · .json · Public domain