Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 SW3D 912 - Prindable v. Walsh

Prindable v. Walsh’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2013
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chromalloy American Corp. v. Elyria Foundry Co. · Sofka v. Thal · Fix v. Fix · McIntosh v. Foulke · Preferred Physicians Mutual Management Group v. Preferred Physicians Mutual Risk Retention

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In reviewing the circuit court’s dismissal of a petition, [an appellate court] determines if the facts pleaded and the inferences reasonably drawn therefrom state any ground for relief. We treat the facts averred as true and construe the averments liberally and favorably to the plaintiff. A petition is not to be dismissed for failure to state a claim if any set of facts is asserted which, if proved, would entitle the plaintiff to relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.