Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 U.S. 237 - Miller v. Sherry

Miller v. Sherry’s Empirical Analysis

69 U.S. 237 · 1864

Citation profile

91
cited by 91 later decisions
5
cited 5 times by the Supreme Court
21
states following
April 1943
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 5 district · 41 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 91 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1943 · most notably Metcalf Brothers Company v. Benjamin Barker Jr (1902), Farmers' Loan Trust Company v. Lake Street Elevated Railroad Company (1900)

15 federal appellate · 5 district · 41 state decisions — followed in 21 states

240186418701880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Case v. Brown · Wallis's Heirs v. Wilson's Heirs · Lessee of Shepherd v. Commissioners

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““His right could not be affected by anything that occurred subsequently. Ho had no constructive notice of tho proceedings in the Case of Milla & Bliss, [that is, of the senior creditors’ bill.] Had ho and Ms alienee actual notice? This also is a material inquiry. Wo have looked carefully through the record, and find no evidence on the subject. Had the suit below been in equity it would have been necessary for tho defendant in error to deny notice to himself or to his grantor. The want of notice to either would have been sufficient. The form of the action rendered a denial necessary.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The judgment obtained by Mills & Bliss was the elder one, but it was subsequent to the conveyance from Miller to Williams. • It is not contended that the judgment was a lien on the premises. The legal title having passed from, the judgment debtor before its rendition, by a deed valid as between him and his grantee, it could not have that effect by operation of law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “amended bill, it is regarded as an original bill for that purpose,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.