Miller v. Sherry’s Empirical Analysis
69 U.S. 237 · 1864
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 5 district · 41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 91 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 1943 · most notably Metcalf Brothers Company v. Benjamin Barker Jr (1902), Farmers' Loan Trust Company v. Lake Street Elevated Railroad Company (1900)
15 federal appellate · 5 district · 41 state decisions — followed in 21 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Case v. Brown · Wallis's Heirs v. Wilson's Heirs · Lessee of Shepherd v. Commissioners
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““His right could not be affected by anything that occurred subsequently. Ho had no constructive notice of tho proceedings in the Case of Milla & Bliss, [that is, of the senior creditors’ bill.] Had ho and Ms alienee actual notice? This also is a material inquiry. Wo have looked carefully through the record, and find no evidence on the subject. Had the suit below been in equity it would have been necessary for tho defendant in error to deny notice to himself or to his grantor. The want of notice to either would have been sufficient. The form of the action rendered a denial necessary.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The judgment obtained by Mills & Bliss was the elder one, but it was subsequent to the conveyance from Miller to Williams. • It is not contended that the judgment was a lien on the premises. The legal title having passed from, the judgment debtor before its rendition, by a deed valid as between him and his grantee, it could not have that effect by operation of law.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sawtelle v. Weymouth“amended bill, it is regarded as an original bill for that purpose,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.