State v. Tice’s Empirical Analysis
1912
Citation profile
3 district · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently November 1979 · most notably State Ex Rel. Bacich v. Huse (1936), 92 Wash. 2d 939 - Puget Sound Gillnetters Ass'n v. Moos (1979)
3 district · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Lawton v. Steele · Geer v. State of Connecticut · Magner v. People · Smith v. State · State v. Storey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The decisions of the courts in this country, so far as they have come to our notice, are all in unison in holding that there is no private right in the citizen to take fish or game, except as such right is either expressly or inferentially given by the state.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McMillan v. Sims““ ‘The fish in the waters of the state, and the game in its forests, belong to the people of the state, in their sovereign capacity, who, through their representatives, the legislature, have sole control thereof, and may permit or prohibit their taking. ’ ’ ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.