Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 Wash. 2d 120 - State v. Lewis

69 Wash. 2d 120 - State v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
4
states following
August 2001
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently August 2001 · most notably 73 Wash. 2d 271 - State v. Davis (1968), 123 Wash. 2d 467 - State v. Dent (1994)

26 state decisions

13019661970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 67 Wash. 2d 681 - State v. Willis · Williams v. State · 36 Wash. 2d 641 - State v. Leach · 55 Wash. 2d 490 - State v. Christensen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The state, in a prosecution for an attempted crime, must prove that the defendant actually intended to commit the target crime, and that he performed an overt act directed toward its commission. There must be a unity of intent and overt act. Both elements must coincide. State v. Christensen, 55 Wn.2d 490 , 348 P.2d 408 (1960); State v. Leach, 36 Wn.2d 641 , 219 P.2d 972 (1950); 1 Wharton, Criminal Law and Procedure § 71, p. 152 (1957); 21 Am. Jur. 2d Criminal Law § 110 (1965).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A case in point, though not from our jurisdiction, is Williams v. State, 209 Miss. 902, 909 , 48 So.2d 598 (1950), where it was said: The rule is well recognized that “whenever the design of a person to commit crime is clearly shown, slight acts done in furtherance of this design will constitute an attempt”.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.