Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 Wash. 2d 155 - State v. Finlayson

69 Wash. 2d 155 - State v. Finlayson’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
November 2008
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2008

14 state decisions

6019661970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shotwell Manufacturing Company v. United States · State v. Phillips · State v. Rholeder · 18 Wash. 2d 484 - W. E. Roche Fruit Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The purpose of all [the statutes prescribing the manner of making up the jury lists] is to provide a fair and impartial jury, and if that end has been attained and the litigant has had the benefit of such a jury, it ought not to be held that the whole proceeding must be annulled because of some slight irregularity that has had no effect upon the purpose to be effected.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “". . . [I]f the prisoner has been tried by an impartial jury, it would be nonsense to grant a new trial or a venire de novo upon this ground, in order that he might be again tried by another impartial jury." 1 Thompson, Trials, § 120.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Where the selection process is in substantial compliance with the statutes, the defendant must show prejudice. If there has been a material departure from the statutes, prejudice will be presumed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.