Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 Wash. 2d 346 - Coy v. Raabe

69 Wash. 2d 346 - Coy v. Raabe’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
6
states following
August 2011
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 4 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently August 2011 · most notably Mort v. United States (1996), Universal Title Insurance v. United States (1991)

10 federal appellate · 4 district · 26 state decisions

190196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 63 Wash. 2d 183 - Credit Bureau Corp. v. Beckstead · 62 Wash. 2d 753 - Graham v. Raabe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[S]ubrogation is a consequence which equity attaches to certain conditions. It is not an absolute right, but one which depends upon the equities and attending facts and circumstances of each case.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he former are bona fide purchasers to the extent that they were entitled to rely upon others who were paid to give an expert opinion and insure title. The latter are engaged in giving those expert opinions for a consideration. In equity, [the purchasers] and [the title insurer] are poles apart.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In [the superior court’s] determination, defendants Raabe shall be credited with all sums advanced or expended by them, exclusive of attorney’s fees, and shall be debited with rentals received and all sums paid them by the intervenors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.