69 Wash. 2d 436 - State v. Denney’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2011
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 63 Wash. 2d 176 - State v. Badda · 66 Wash. 2d 278 - State v. Holbrook · 36 Wash. 2d 641 - State v. Leach · 24 Wash. 2d 775 - State v. Rosencrans · 63 Wash. 2d 731 - State v. Gilcrease
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence or a motion having that effect admits the truth of the evidence of the party against whom the challenge or motion is made and all inferences that reasonably can be drawn from such evidence, and requires that the evidence be interpreted most strongly against the challenger or movant party and in the light most favorable to the opposing party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.