69 Wash. 2d 886 - State v. Canady’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently February 2006 · most notably 78 Wash. 2d 9 - State v. Zornes (1970), 102 Wash. 2d 277 - State v. Dictado (1984)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gore v. United States · Beck v. Washington · Lem Woon v. State of Oregon · 48 Wash. 2d 545 - In RE OLSEN v. Delmore · United States v. Garnes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The use of RCW 9.95.015 requires allegation and proof of the carrying of a “deadly weapon,” which phrase is clearly defined in RCW 9.95.040. Use of a “deadly weapon” is not a necessary element of the crime of burglary in the second degree. Thus, the prosecutor’s decision to bring into play the procedure of RCW 9.95.015 is not governed solely by his own discretion. The requirements of proof and his ability to meet them are determinative of the decision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The basis for the decision was that the elements of the two crimes differed, and there was a legislative standard for the prosecution to use in determining which offenders should be charged under which statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.