69 Wash. App. 369 - State v. Karp’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably State v. Eastmond (1996), State v. Eastmond (1996)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Federal Trade Commission v. Textile & Apparel Group · 90 Wash. 2d 443 - State v. Workman · 119 Wash. 2d 294 - State v. Ortiz · 81 Wash. 2d 628 - State v. Frazier · 114 Wash. 2d 59 - State v. Fowler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“INSTRUCTION NO. 6 To convict the defendant of the crime of assault in the second degree, each of the following elements of the crime must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) That on or about the 30th day of September, 1988, the defendant intentionally assaulted [the victim] with a deadly weapon. (2) That the acts occurred in Snohomish County, Washington. If you find from the evidence that each of these elements has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt, then it will be your duty to return a verdict of guilty. On the other hand, if, after weighing all of the evidence, you have a reasonable doubt as to any one of these elements, then it will be your duty to return a verdict of not guilty. INSTRUCTION NO. 7 An assault is an intentional act, with unlawful force, which is capable of inflicting bodily injury upon another or is accompanied by the apparent present ability to inflict bodily injury upon another. It is not necessary that bodily injury be inflicted or that apprehension and fear of bodily injury be created in another. INSTRUCTION NO. 8 A person acts with intent or intentionally when acting with the objective or purpose to accomplish a result which constitutes a crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Eastmond“[i]t shall be unlawful for any person to carry, exhibit, display, or draw any firearm ... in a manner, under circumstances, and at a time and place that either manifests an intent to intimidate another or that warrants alarm for the safety of other persons.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Baggett“A person is guilty of assault in the second degree if he or she, under circumstances not amounting to assault in the first degree: (c) Assaults another with a deadly weapon[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.