Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 WVA 233 - Hoffman v. Shoemaker

Hoffman v. Shoemaker’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2010

9 state decisions

3019111920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lampman v. . Milks · Warren v. Blake · Crosland v. Rogers · 18 N.J. Eq. 260 - Fetters v. Humphreys · Pingree v. McDuffie

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the textbooks and decided cases, we are told that the easement, to pass to the grantee, or be retained by the grantor, by implication only, must be apparent, continuous and necessary.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““This quality or characteristic of continuousness does not belong to a right of way. Such an easement is not self-operating. It is only a place in which its owner operates. ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.