Commonwealth v. Feineigle’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 2017
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 657 (§ 8 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970) · 30 U.S.C. § 813
Relies on Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco · See v. City of Seattle · Donovan v. Dewey · 299 Pa. Super. 64 - Commonwealth v. Sanford · Wicker v. Civil Service Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[wjhen issues are not properly raised and developed in briefs, when the briefs are wholly inadequate to present specific issues for review, a court will not consider the merits thereof.” Commonwealth v. Feineigle, 690 A.2d 748 , 751 n. 5 (Pa.Cmwlth.1997).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The argument shall be divided into as many parts as there are questions to be argued; and shall have at the head of each part — in distinctive type or in type distinctively displayed' — the particular point treated therein, followed by such discussion and citation of authorities as are deemed pertinent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.