Cabais v. Egger’s Empirical Analysis
690 F.2d 234 · 1982
Citation profile
43 federal appellate · 22 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 105 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2023 · most notably 38 Cal. 3d 913 - Perdue v. Crocker National Bank (1985), American Hospital Ass'n v. Bowen (1987)
43 federal appellate · 22 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 3301 (Federal Unemployment Tax Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 3304 (Federal Unemployment Tax Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 291 · 42 U.S.C. § 503 (§ 303 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 552 (Freedom of Information Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 704 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Union Carbide Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Pickus v. United States Board of Parole · Batterton v. Marshall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 105 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[a statement] as to what the administrative officer thinks the statute or regulation means.’ ”))).”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(a) Requirements. The Secretary of Labor shall approve any State law submitted to him, within 830 days of such submission, which he finds provides that- [[Image here]] (15) the amount of compensation payable to an individual for any week which begins after March 31, 1980, and which begins in a period with respect to which such individual is receiving a governmental or other pension, retirement or retired pay, annuity, or any other similar periodic payment which is based on the previous work of such individual shall be reduced (but not below zero) by an amount equal to the amount of such pension, retirement or retired pay, annuity, or other payment, which is reasonably attributable to such week except that- (A) the requirements of this paragraph shall apply to any pension, retirement or retired pay, annuity, or other similar periodic payments only if- (i) such pension, retirement or retired pay, annuity, or similar payment is under a plan maintained (or contributed to) by a base period employer or chargeable employer....”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Simply because agency action has substantial impact does not mean it is subject to notice and comment if it is otherwise expressly exempt under the APA.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.