Chu v. Schweiker’s Empirical Analysis
690 F.2d 330 · 1982
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2010
9 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Perry v. Sindermann · Califano v. Sanders · Goss v. Lopez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Pjlaintiffs' claim, if valid at all, is contractual in nature and exceeds $10,000, their exclusive remedy is in the Court of Claims. Thus, the District Court did not have jurisdiction to issue a declaratory judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“create a property interest for purposes of due process when they are contrary to the express provisions of regulations and statutes”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Shlay v. Montgomery
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.