Egle v. E Egle

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 15, 1982.

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 1983

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“the United States District Court for the District of the Canal Zone”

quoted by 1 later decision, including Jc Egle v. E Egle

Relies on D Demarsh v. Daniel

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Flaxman & Flaxman, Charles Flaxman, Coral Gables, Fla., for defendant-appellant.

Abrams & Abrams, Edward C. Vining, Jr., Miami, Fla., Albert J. Joyce, Jr., Balboa, Republic of Panama, for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of the Canal Zone; FRANK H. McFADDEN, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before GEE, GARZA and TATE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Arguable questions of jurisdiction being raised on rehearing, and the panel being in disagreement both as to these and as to the merits, we vacate our former judgment, 673 F.2d 1326, classify the appeal as Class IV, transfer the appeal to the oral argument calendar, and expedite it. It is so

¶2

ORDERED.