Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 690 F.3d 161 - In re Philadelphia Newspapers, LLC

In re Philadelphia Newspapers, LLC’s Empirical Analysis

690 F.3d 161 · 2012

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
4
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Pennsylvania Eastern District Court)

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1101 · 11 U.S.C. § 503 · 28 U.S.C. § 157 · 28 U.S.C. § 158

Relies on United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property · Reading Company v. Brown · Trone v. Roberts Farms, Inc. · In re PWS Holding Corp. · Fadiga v. Attorney General USA

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether the reorganization plan has been substantially consummated, (2) whether a stay has been obtained, (3) whether the relief requested would affect the rights of parties not before the court, (4) whether the relief requested would affect the success of the plan, and (5) the public policy of affording finality to bankruptcy judgments.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]hough a link and reference may bring readers' attention to the existence of an article, they do not republish the article.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It appears that the common thread of traditional republication is that it presents the material, in its entirety, before a new audience. A mere reference to a previously published article does not do that. While it may call the existence of the article to the attention of a new audience, it does not present the defamatory contents of the article to that audience. Therefore, a reference, without more, is not properly a republication.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.