Kenemore v. Roy’s Empirical Analysis
690 F.3d 639 · 2012
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 664 (Welfare and Pension Plans Disclosure Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Cage v. Louisiana · Melvin Tyler v. Burl Cain Warden · Reyes-Requena v. United States · Jago v. Van Curen · Lawrence Ex Rel. Lawrence v. Chater
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A GVR does not bind the lower court to which the case is remanded; that court is free to determine whether its original decision is still correct in light of the changed circumstances or whether a different result is more appropriate.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) the [§ 2241] petition raises a claim “that is based on a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision”; (2) the claim was previously “foreclosed by circuit law at the time when [it] should have been raised in petitioner’s trial, appeal or first § 2255 motion”; and (3) that retroactively applicable decision establishes that “the petitioner may have been convicted of a nonexistent offense.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Santillana v. Upton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.