Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

690 P.2d 473

Manous v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 1, 1984

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · decided 1984-11-01

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 1997

1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

Relies on Skelton v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-11-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER REVERSING CONVICTION AND REMANDING FOR NEW TRIAL

¶2The appellee, State of Oklahoma, has filed a “Motion for Order to Remand Case to Trial Court with Instructions to Vacate *474Judgment and Sentence and Grant Appellant a New Trial” in the above styled and numbered appeal, conceding that a possible conflict of interest exists because Tom Giu-lioli, who originally represented the appellant later accepted a position as an Assistant District Attorney and aided in the prosecution of the appellant. See, Skelton v. State, 672 P.2d 671 (Okl.Cr.1983).

¶3Being sufficiently advised in the premises, this Court finds that the State’s motion should be and the same hereby is GRANTED, and the above styled and numbered cause should be and the same hereby is REVERSED and REMANDED.

¶4IT IS SO ORDERED.

¶5WITNESS OUR HANDS AND THE SEAL OF THIS COURT this 1st day of November, 1984.

HEZ J. BUSSEY, P.J.ED PARKS, J.TOM BRETT, J.
/690/p2d/473 · .json · Public domain