Cunningham v. Cunningham’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 2004
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Isaak v. Massachusetts Indemnity Life Insurance · 16 Utah 2d 378 - Bradbury v. Rasmussen · Hendee v. Walker Bank & Trust Co. · 4 Utah 2d 277 - In Re Swan's Estate · 19 Utah 2d 414 - In Re the Estate of Ekker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A court does not have carte blanch to reform any transaction to include terms that it believes are fair. Its discretion is narrowly bounded.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.